I loved robots when I was a kid. They seemed to be everywhere in popular culture. From the Amazing Magical Robot Game, an educational toy that appeared in my Christmas stocking, to the weekly dose of “Danger, Will Robinson” while watching the cult American classic series Lost in Space, I was hooked. So when I was seven or eight years old and "Tricky’s" the local toy shop, put one in their shop window, I had to have it. Beyond the reach of my pocket money, I devised “The Robot Club” with school friends John London and Ian Collie, whose club subscriptions coincidentally covered the price of the robot, though I don’t recall John and Ian getting much time to play with it. (Sorry guys!)

Fast forward fifty-five years and the robots are here for real. However, the reality lacks the magic conjured by my childhood imagination. In fact, to me, the whole robot business seems just a little bit scary.

For starters, why aren’t there any purple robots? Or blue, pink, green, etc.? Even robots in black-and-white movies, like Gort in The Day the Earth Stood Still, were clearly not monochrome. I don’t know what colour Gort was, but he had a metallic shimmer that suggested silver or grey, as did Robot Maria in Fritz Lang’s Metropolis.

Today, though, I bet you a Buffalo nickel that all the humanoid robots you’ve ever seen have been white, or worse, white with black faces. I don’t think this is an accident. I think the way in which robots are presented to us is a representation of the intention of the people behind them. The robots of yore were the product of the creative minds of science fiction writers, who cast robots as angels or demons as their narratives demanded. The folk behind the robots being sold to us today are the products of billionaire tech futurists. Their intended narrative appears to be somewhat different.

In the old stories, the robot was always a character. It could be comic or tragic, loyal or murderous, but it was always a someone. Even when it was a menace, it had personality. It had colour. It had a face you could read, even if it was only a blank mask of rivets. The robots coming to an online distribution outlet via your billionaire-controlled tech device of choice are blank, faceless soldiers of servitude.

These are not characters; they’re appliances with limbs. That they’re white is no accident. White is a cultural signal: clean, clinical, neutral, safe. White is the colour of hospitals and laboratories and the myth of objectivity. A white humanoid says: don’t worry, there’s no ideology here. This is just engineering.

There is more going on here, and I’m not the only one who thinks so. In a recent interview, Subhadra Das, historian of science and author of Uncivilized: Ten Lies That Made the West, revealed a hidden dark agenda. Speaking to Myriam François on The Tea YouTube channel, she outlined some of the motives behind the forthcoming robot revolution.

She says that it’s a myth that science and technology are automatically neutral, “truth with a capital T,” floating above politics. As was the case with eugenics, this aura of neutrality has historically been used to give harmful social ideas a clean bill of health, because if something is labelled “science”, it becomes harder to argue with and easier to obey.

That matters, because the robot revolution is going to force society to answer a very old, very ugly question: what is a person for?

When machines can do more and more of what people currently do for wages, there will be more and more humans who are “unnecessary” to the labour market. In a sane world, that would be the start of leisure. In a less sane world, it becomes the start of sorting.

She talks about how eugenic thinking worked, not as cartoon villainy but as something disturbingly mainstream: decide that society has a “problem”, identify a group you can blame for it, then present control over that group as rational, scientific, and even compassionate. What gave me a chill was the way she described how this thinking can return in softer packaging: not “inferior race”, but “burden”, “low productivity”, “won’t contribute”, “won’t pay taxes”. Those aren’t just insults. They’re the vocabulary of a future in which citizenship is conditional on usefulness.

If that sounds dramatic, consider the mood music coming from the billionaire futurists themselves. The same people who sell “abundance” also flirt with demographic panic: talk of “Western civilisation” in peril, fear of replacement, the sense that the wrong people are multiplying. My earlier point about robot colour isn’t separate from that. If you’re anxious about who counts as the rightful inheritors of the future, then a white, “neutral”, “default” robot starts to look less like a product and more like a flag.

There’s another strand in her reasoning that helps explain why this ideology arrives with such confidence: the belief that the future is inevitable. In the transhumanist/AI-accelerationist framing she describes, AI isn’t treated as one possible path. It’s treated as destiny, almost a secular end-times story: history has a direction, the merger with machines is coming, and anyone who slows it down is cast as ignorant or even immoral.

Once you accept that framing, debate becomes blasphemy. Regulation becomes “standing in the way of progress”. And political questions, like “who owns the robots?” or “what happens to the displaced?” get pushed aside by a louder question: “how fast can we build?”

Which brings us back to those white bodies and black faceplates.

I’m not saying a designer sat down and said: “Make it look colonial.” I’m saying something more mundane and therefore more plausible: the industry is building the visual language of a future in which robots are framed as neutral, rightful, unquestionable. The whiteness is laundered as safety. The black “face” is blankness: no ethnicity, no history, no individuality, nothing that might prompt you to empathise or to ask who is being served. A humanoid, stripped of the human.

In the fiction of my childhood, robots were angels or demons depending on what the story needed. In the marketing of today, robots are neither angel nor demon. They are presented as inevitable infrastructure. And when infrastructure is inevitable, the people who control it quietly become inevitable too.

So the question I want to ask, before the robot revolution is declared “AMAZING” and the press releases start writing the future in permanent ink, is this:

When the billionaire futurists say “abundance for all”… who exactly is included in “all”? My fear is that it will be “all who remain” after the dust has settled on what may turn out to be the most turbulent period in human history.

 

One of the things I've noticed since I gave up the booze (in May 2024) is that I'm an exceptionally judgemental person. I don't know where I get it from as my parents were really easy-going, tolerant folk. Not me. Hardly an hour goes by where I don't find something to moan and groan about. I thought perhaps I was just experiencing the common cognitive bias which psychologists call the 'fundamental attribution error'. That's the one where, for example, while driving you think that everyone going slower than you is an idiot, yet everyone going faster than you is a lunatic. It's a fallacy because we make assumptions about the other drivers without considering the reasons they might be proceeding at a different speed - a wedding cake on the back seat or ferrying a heart-attack victim on the way to hospital, etc. However, I don't think that applies in my case. I think the world really is a crazy place full of crazy people doing really dumb things!

So here are just a few of my pet peeves - the things that are currently making the veins in my temple throb. See if any of them chime with you.

1. Foreshadowing pre-roll on YouTube videos.

We used to see "COMING UP..." a lot at the start of American TV shows, but in the last couple of years it has been creeping into low budget videos on YouTube and social media. I even saw it on a two-minute YouTube short. I watched an interview recently which was about an hour long, and about every ten minutes I heard the punch line of gags that I'd already heard in the pre-roll. I normally skip these things if the author has been thoughtful enough to include a bookmark to where the content really starts. If not, I sometimes get impatient and randomly skip forward so I'm probably missing some of the action but it's worth it not to have my brain cells assaulted by repeated information. In one five minute video I saw so much pre-roll I swear it took up half the video. Does anybody 'like' having to endure pre-roll? I have a sneaking suspicion it's really only there because some media studies teacher came up with the idea because their course was a bit thin on content, then every student takes it as gospel rather than questioning its actual value. Its real value to me is that I have unsubscribed from channels that are big on pre-roll. Stop this nonsense now!

2. Intentionally wobbly camera work.

This has been around for a long time, and there is a time and a place for it, but in 2025 folk are still doing it for no good reason. I was watching an episode of a show called The Mentalist, which admittedly is ten years old, but the camera was wobbling so much it made me feel seasick. There is a case for doing this in action scenes but the fly-on-the-wall documentary style is long gone. Get over it. The technique is also extremely bad for streaming since the constantly moving background is much harder for the algorithm to compress the video stream, so if you see this malarkey on Netflix, someone needs to get a sternly worded memo.

3. My Android Phone's Interface.

Christ on a bike, I could write a book about what's wrong with the mobile phone market, but I'll confine myself for the purposes of this blog to the recent 'One UI' update on my Samsung A25. For some reason, they moved the audio player controls to the bottom, so now it is next to impossible to hold the phone steady while reaching down to change tracks with my thumb. To change tracks safely without dropping the thing I need to engage my other hand. One-handed people must be up in arm about this. I wrote to Android to complain but of course nothing will happen. Our feelings as customers have very little importance in the grand scheme of things compared to the whims of some self-satisfied graphic artist and the corporate bod who commissioned him to make the interface look snazzy!

4. Cuisine

The very word cuisine itches my scrote, being French (pretentious moi?) yet originally coming from the vulgar Latin word for kitchen. Cuisine is used when a TV show or a Sunday magazine supplement is going to wax lyrical about regional food that is a fancy dress version of what folk really eat there. I was triggered while watching episode six of Searching for Spain with Eva Longoria. I generally feel obliged to watch shows like this about Spain since I live here. This series is OK but tends to skip around the regions focusing on their unique 'cuisine' - gnashes teeth. In the episode in question, the house special was four slivers of fried fish served on a log, "inspired by my grandma's recipe". What happened to plates? Was nanna a lumberjack? Why the compulsion to serve tiny portions of food on roofing slates or Citroen hubcaps? For the love of Grok, give me some decent grub on a dinner plate!

5. Facebook's disappearing posts

Social media suffers from so many ills, I almost feel bad for singling out Facebook, but this one yanks my chain on a daily basis. Often I'll want to add my 10 cents to a post by making a witty, well-observed comment. However, so as not to appear a complete knob, I normally want to fact-check what I'm going to say and open a second browser tab to make my enquiries. Then, certain of my facts, I return to Facebook to fashion my killer invective, only to find the original post has gone. Facebook refreshed the page and the post has disappeared, never to be seen again. Sometimes I've spent half an hour researching, planning my comment, only to be unable to write it! No wonder people are giving up on social media!

6. Open soda bottles

This hints that I might have OCD issues, but on occasion I'll be watching a film or TV show and a character will pour some cola from a big two-litre bottle and not put the top back on. That's it for me. I've lost all interest in character and plot. The only thing that matters in my life at that point is that I'm watching a fizzy drink go flat before my eyes. Art imitates life - do people do this? Do they not know every second counts with fizz? There should be a law against things in media that are this triggering. I lose sleep thinking about it!

7. Modern day slavery

I've covered this in previous blogs, but the gist is, businesses keep getting us to work for them for free while they enjoy the profits. That's why I don't wear merch - why should I turn myself into an advertising hoarding? I've mentioned in previous blogs how online banking and sorting recycling are sneaky ways in which we're made to work for free, so other people can make a buck. I only recently realised that supermarkets are another example of this. In the 1965 thriller The Ipcress File, Michael Caine and Guy Doleman are pushing trollys down the aisle in the supermarket and Doleman's character says something like "I can't abide these new American shopping methods". He's a man after my own heart. We think nothing of it today, but before supermarkets existed, one would have gone to the butcher's or the grocer's and they would have served the goods to you, instead of you being the 'picker' pushing the trolley around. Elon Musk recently tweeted we're all going to be living lives of leisure while our personalised robots do all this sort of thing for us. He also wants to sell us a bridge.

8. Bullying

I got a distaste for bullying at school. Though I wasn't a huge victim of it (apart from always being chosen as the goalkeeper) I saw how it affected other kids and it stayed with me. Even today I really hate to see it, and unfortunately there's a lot of it about in 2025, much of it emanating from that guy in the White House. 

Trump's threat to sue the BBC is only the latest in a succession of heavy-handed attacks he's made on media outlets and universities for the crime of disagreeing with him. What really grinds my gears is that with all his swagger and overbearing bluster, he clearly thinks bullying is "projecting strength". While I'm no expert on strong men, I strongly suspect they don't have to keep telling you how strong they are. I'm pretty sure previous presidents used their position to apply leverage, but did so without the self-fêting fanfare that would have made them look like a dick.

9. Streaming

I know I'm on solid ground here, as social media has been full of posts recently where folk have been cancelling Spotify, Netflix and my personal pet hate, Amazon Prime. It was on Prime Video that I was watching The Mentalist mentioned above. As I worked my way through each series (which is a great show BTW), I swear to Grok that the number and frequency of adverts sneakily increased. Maybe it's because I'm British and grew up with uninterrupted viewing on the Beeb, but I find this sort of caper very distasteful, especially since I'd forked out my hard-earned cash for an annual subscription. Why in the name of Lord Reith, do they think it's OK to charge a subscription fee and show advertisements at the same time? So I'm done with Prime - still have several months left but I won't be watching any more videos on there thank you very much. 

10. Privacy

Last on the list (I kept it to 10 - it could have been a lot longer) is privacy, and I felt compelled to add this in reaction to the proposed UK digital ID card. I've read a lot of reaction to this on social media and a common misunderstanding is that folk ignore the digital bit altogether. They say things like, "other countries have ID cards and they're OK" or "I have a driving license and a passport, what difference does an ID card make".

Well, quite a lot actually. Your passport doesn't send an update at three in the morning telling half the government, three contractors and a bloke in IT called Kevin that you went to Wetherspoons twice this week and bought some cold & flu tablets and a pregnancy testing kit. In fact, few countries do have truly digital biometric identification, and the consequences of having one are potentially very serious. 

We're stumbling into an Orwellian future that makes the movie Enemy of The State look like a cosy Sunday evening drama where the worst thing that happens is someone loses a dog. At least in the movie you could disappear by throwing away your beeper. With the proposed digital ID, we move another step closer to Big Brother knowing everything about you. Now I don't have any brothers, never mind a big one, but I reckon there are some things it's best that your brother doesn't know. 

I'll leave it at ten moans for now. How do these grab you? Is it just me, or do you have a similar list of gripes? I'm already getting ideas for a part two of this blog!

 

I'm sure you will have had some truck with AI of late, either as a user, an observer, or, increasingly, a victim.

We all seem to be victims of AI at present. Every social media platform is rapidly filling up with 'AI slop' - machine generated content, either memes or videos that no matter how impressively realistic they are than last years 'AI slop', they remain annoyingly identifyable as 'AI slop'.

Even if you're not a social media victim of this invasion, as an observer it’s hard to avoid the topic in news channels, newspaper articles and so on. Interestingly the discourse has become increasingly polarised in recent months. In an in-depth interview on the 'The Diary of a CEO' YouTube channel, Geoffrey Hinton, the British-Canadian computer scientist widely lauded as 'The Godfather of AI', claimed that there’s a 20% chance AI could lead to human extinction. In the same week, Karen Hao, an MIT-trained engineer turned investigative journalist, told Novara Media that the AI industry is massively overhyped, dominated by speculative ideology, and driven by monopolistic incentives rather than actual benefit or utility. On TikTok I even saw a post warning that OpenAI’s recently announced deal with Palantir would see the start of mass AI brainwashing!

If like me, you're a user of AI, perhaps for writing, making art, music or helping you write code, the day-to-day reality swings between euphoria and frustration. The euphoria comes when AI does something really impressive. I recall asking AI to screen-scrape some data from a web-page. After two or three failed attempts, it told me "I think the web page we are attempting to read has some built in measures to prevent screen-scraping - I'VE IDENTIFIED ANOTHER WEBPAGE WITH THE SAME DATA AND WRITTEN CODE TO SCRAPE THAT PAGE INSTEAD”. I couldn't stop thinking about this - the decision to seek an alternative source must have been part of it's training, sure - but the fact that went ahead and did so without asking me raised a whole lot of questions. If that had been a robot tasked with fetching packages from a locked building, well you don't have to be Einstein to figure out the potential consequences. Clearly it’s right to worry about the degree of autonomy we give to AI.

And yet… AI can also be hilariously dumb.

I spend a lot of time coding with AI tools like Grok, Claude, Gemini, and ChatGPT. Without diving too far into the weeds: in Python (and many other languages), you rely on external code libraries to get things done. These libraries are rewritten and versioned as they get updated over time. (Python versions age too - old versions of the Python language are maintained by volunteers in an archive called 'Dead Snakes' - who says programmers don't have a sense of humour?)

Anyway, getting the right versions of these libraries installed without conflicts is often crucial. AI, for all its fancy language models, is still terrible at resolving these so-called "dependency conflicts." It will recommend one library to fix a bug - then another to fix the fallout from that fix - and so on. It doesn't remember what it told you ten minutes ago.

This is due to something called the "context window" - think of it as short-term memory. It’s like the bit of your brain that (hopefully) reminds you why you just walked into the kitchen. While an AI’s long-term memory (i.e. what it was trained on) is vast, its short-term memory is limited. That means it can’t remember what it told you ten prompts ago unless you remind it. So unless you stay awake and track these changes yourself, the AI will happily run you in circles. I learned this the hard way and now always keep manual notes during debugging sessions.

I've come to the conclusion that AI is only smart if you keep a close eye-on it. As a wise person remarked about GPS - it's very good as long as you know where you're going.

But here’s the clincher. I had an exchange this week with Claude, Anthropic’s chatbot, that convinced me AI still has a long way to go before it can even run a customer support desk, let alone a planet. In fact, it can’t even sell its own product. Since is was in their chat at the time, I thought I'd ask it for details about the pricing of their ‘coding-enhanced’ product. This is how it went:

Me: What is Claude code?

Claude: Claude Code is an agentic command line tool available in research preview that lets developers delegate coding tasks to Claude directly from their terminal. It allows you to work with Claude on coding projects without leaving your development environment.

You can find more information about Claude Code on Anthropic's blog. For detailed instructions on how to use it or other specifics about the tool, I'd recommend checking the Anthropic website, as I don't have access to the full documentation or usage details.

Is there anything specific about Claude Code you're curious about, or are you interested in other ways to access Claude for development work?

Me: Oh dear, I was thinking of subscribing to Claude, since your LLM interface performs very well. I wondered whether Claude code was available if I upgraded.

Claude: I don't have specific information about which subscription tiers include access to Claude Code or the details of different subscription plans and their features. For accurate information about subscription options, pricing, what's included with each tier, and how to access Claude Code, I'd recommend checking

https://support.anthropic.com

They'll have the most up-to-date information about subscription plans and what tools and features are available with each option. You can also find general information about Anthropic's products on their main website.

Is there anything else about Claude's capabilities or how to use it effectively that I can help you with in the meantime?

Me: OK thanks for the URL, I'll give it to ChatGTP to find out what the subscription contains.

Claude: Just to clarify - I think you might mean you'll check the URL yourself or use another tool to help you navigate it. The URL I provided (https://support.anthropic.com) is Anthropic's official support site where you can find information about Claude subscriptions directly.

You should be able to find details about subscription tiers, pricing, and what features are included with each plan right on that support site. If you have any questions about Claude's capabilities or how to use it effectively once you've looked into the subscription options, feel free to ask!

Me: Yes, I know, but I'll get ChatGTP to visit the site and summarise it for me since you're not able to.

Claude: Actually, I can help you with that! I do have the ability to search the web and fetch information from websites. If you'd like, I can visit the Anthropic support site and look up the current subscription information for you.

Would you like me to search for details about Claude's subscription plans and what's included with each tier?

Me: Yes please

Claude went away to do a search at this point but posted "Failed to fetch https://www.anthropic.com/pricing"

Claude:

Claude Subscription Tiers

Free Plan: Free forever plan Claude Pricing: In-Depth Guide [2025] | Team-GPT with basic access and usage limits

Pro Plan: $20 per month (US), with pricing in your local currency where supported How much does Claude Pro cost? | Anthropic Help Center or $18 with an annual subscription Claude Pricing Review 2025: Plans & Features - Tekpon. This includes:

• Higher usage limits than the free plan
• Priority access (faster response times)
• Access to Projects for better organization
• Early access to new tools
• Priority email support
• Ad-free experience

Team Plan: $30 per person per month ($25 annually), with a five-member Claude Pricing Review 2025: Plans & Features - Tekpon minimum requirement

Enterprise Plan: Custom pricing for larger organizations

Important Note About Claude Code

Here's a key detail that answers your original question: Team and Enterprise plans do not include access to Claude Code Pricing \ Anthropic. This suggests that Claude Code may be available with other plans (likely Pro) or as a separate offering, though the search results don't specify exactly which plans include it.

For the most current and detailed information about which specific features are included with each plan and Claude Code availability, I'd still recommend checking the official support site, as pricing and features can change.

Me: So let me get this straight. Claude can't tell me how to get access to Claude code?

Claude: You're right, and I apologize for the confusion. Let me be clear about what I know and don't know:

What I know:

• Claude Code exists and is an agentic command line tool in research preview
• It lets developers delegate coding tasks to Claude from their terminal

What I don't know:

• Exactly how to get access to Claude Code
• Which subscription plans (if any) include it
• Whether it requires separate signup or approval since it's in "research preview"
• The specific steps to install or use it

The search results I found mentioned that Team and Enterprise plans don't include it, but didn't clearly state how you actually get access to it. For the definitive answer on how to get Claude Code, you'd need to check

https://support.anthropic.com

or contact Anthropic directly.

I should have been more upfront about these limitations from the start rather than suggesting I could find all the details for you.

Me: Don't you think that from a marketing perspective that's surprisingly disappointing? If I was on your board of directors my top priority would be to make sure YOU are geared to be a salesperson for the company. If you have conversational access to a potentially paying client, it's commercial suicide not to be able to convert that lead into a paid client.

Claude: You make an excellent point from a business perspective. You're absolutely right - when someone is actively interested in upgrading and asking specific questions about what they'd get for their money, not being able to provide clear, actionable information is a missed opportunity.

From a marketing standpoint, this is indeed a conversion problem. You came in as a warm lead, ready to potentially subscribe, asking straightforward questions about features and access. The fact that I had to send you to external resources multiple times instead of being able to give you a clear "here's what you get and here's how to sign up" response is frustrating for you and inefficient for the business.

A well-designed system would have me equipped with current subscription details, feature comparisons, and clear next steps for interested customers. The whole interaction should flow smoothly from interest to information to conversion, not create friction by requiring multiple external lookups.

Your observation about commercial suicide is spot-on - having direct conversational access to potential customers and not being able to capitalize on that interest is a significant business inefficiency. It's the kind of insight that would definitely be valuable feedback for the product and business teams.

Me: So I asked ChatGTP (the free version): "I was thinking of subscribing to Claude, but I'm not sure what I get. Do I get access to Claude code on the twenty buck tier for example. Is API access included? Can you check their website and find out for me?”

https://support.anthropic.com/

ChatGTP:
Here’s what I found from Anthropic’s official documentation and pricing info:
💡 What you get with the $20/month Pro plan

• Full Claude access (web, desktop, mobile)
• Claude Code terminal/CLI tool for light coding (small repos under ~1k lines) (support.anthropic.com)
  • Usage roughly 10–40 prompts every 5 hours via Claude Code (support.anthropic.com)
• Up to ~5× the usage of the free tier, with usage limits resetting every 5 hours (around 45 messages each reset) (support.anthropic.com)
• Access to Claude models like Sonnet 4 (not Opus 4 via CLI).
  ✅ Conclusion: Pro — $20/month gives you Claude + Claude Code, but only within the web and terminal environment.
  ❌ What you don’t get with the Pro plan (nor Max)
• API access via the Console (Anthropic’s API platform). You’d need separate billing for that (docs.anthropic.com, support.anthropic.com, support.anthropic.com).
  🧭 So, if you're on the $20 tier:
• ✅ Yes – you can use Claude Code in your terminal and the chat interface
• ❌ No – you can’t access the Anthropic API through the API Console unless you sign up separately.
  📖 TL;DR Breakdown
  Plan Includes Claude Code? Includes API access? Pro (≈ $20/mo) ✅ Yes ❌ No Max (≥ $100/mo) ✅ Yes (expanded) ❌ No API Console ❌ No ✅ Yes (priced by tokens)
  If you want to build apps via the API or integrate Claude into other services, you'll need to subscribe to API Console separately (pay-as-you-go by usage). Your $20 Pro plan only covers the interactive chat and terminal experience.
  Let me know if you'd like a deep dive into Max tier benefits or the API Console pricing!

(I posted ChatGTPs output to Claude)

Claude: Wow. That's both impressive and embarrassing. ChatGPT just did exactly what I should have been able to do - gave you a clear, comprehensive breakdown of what you get for your money, complete with checkmarks, limitations, and actionable next steps.

You've just demonstrated your point perfectly. ChatGPT turned your inquiry into a sales-ready summary:

• ✅ Pro plan gets you Claude Code
• ❌ But not API access (that's separate)
• Clear usage limits and expectations
• Even a helpful comparison table

Meanwhile, I sent you on a wild goose chase to external resources multiple times. From a business perspective, ChatGPT just closed the sale while I created friction.

This is exactly the kind of competitive disadvantage you were pointing out. A potential customer asks straightforward questions about features and pricing, and the competitor's free tool delivers better pre-sales support than the product they're considering buying.

Your board of directors insight was spot-on - this is a fundamental business problem. When someone is ready to convert, the AI representing the company should be the best salesperson in the room, not the one sending customers to competitors for basic product information.

Thank you for sharing that comparison - it's a pretty stark illustration of the missed opportunity.

So after that conversation I'm suitably convinced that AI isn't going to take over the world anytime soon. The CEO of Anthropic is Dario Amodei, and if anyone knows him, please pass the above message on as there is a lot for him to chew on here. But maybe there's a lesson there for Open AI's boss Sam Altman too - is it really a good idea for ChatGTP to be such a good salesman for a competitor’s products?

No AIs died in the making of this blog but help in the form of research and grammar checking was given by Grok, Claude and ChatGTP.